Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good Design Award (Japan) (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. ✗plicit 03:09, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Good Design Award (Japan) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. All the sources I could find in Japanese or English seem to be from the institute giving the award, social media, or press releases from awardees. There's no secondary coverage. For those editors that point to the Japanese-language Wikipedia article, that article relies almost entirely upon one source: Japan Institute of Design Promotion who hands out the awards. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:06, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:08, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:08, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Awards-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:09, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Seems to be notable in academia:
- 史郎, 青木; 淳, 秋元; 夢非, 劉 (2012). "グッドデザイン賞の歴史と現状(グッドデザインと機械工学)". 日本機械学会誌. 115 (1119): 72–81. doi:10.1299/jsmemag.115.1119_72.
- Sakuma, Ayaki; Ono, Kenta; Watanabe, Makoto (2014). "Study on Reconstruction of the Design Evaluation Process and Criteria Intended for Good Design Award". Proceedings of the Annual Conference of Jssd. 61: 137. doi:10.11247/jssd.61.0_137.
- 雄亮, 蘆澤 (2016). "デザイン賞制度のあり方に関する考察(1)". 日本デザイン学会研究発表大会概要集. 63: 97. doi:10.11247/jssd.63.0_97.
- 充, 北村; 和宏, 中本; 健太, 小野; 誠, 渡邉 (2013). "グッドデザイン賞におけるユーザインタフェースデザイン評価方法についての検討". デザイン学研究. 60 (4): 4_97–4_104. doi:10.11247/jssdj.60.4_97.
- 原, 泰史; 吉岡(小林), 徹; 蘆澤, 雄亮 (April 2017). "グッドデザイン賞の研究用データベースの概要とその利用".
{{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires|journal=
(help) - 安田, 利宏; 北尾, 靖雅 (2020-02-03). "分譲住宅の設計手法の研究 : グッドデザイン賞を受賞した計画を対象として". repo.kyoto-wu.ac.jp. Retrieved 2021-08-04.
- 哲朗, 工藤, 徹 野瀬, 尚起 苅谷 (2018-06-19). デザイン分析 ~良いデザインを考える~. 秋田県立大学. OCLC 1060446449.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
- Jumpytoo Talk 02:04, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep This award has been mentioned by many academic treatises and has received a lot of attention.[1] Ivoory432 (talk) 10:24, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 00:46, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 00:46, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 02:36, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 02:36, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.